Cén áit don chultúr sa ré nua teicneolaíochta?

Ag taifead ag ceolchoirm

In this article for Beo! I write about the place of culture in the technological age. at the very botom you’ll find link to a previous blogpost that covers some of the same ground. I kick off here with a link to a great blog post by Aonghus Ó hAlmhain about developing programmers. I also write a little about the Stop SOPA Ireland campaign.

Críochnaigh mé m’alt deiridh ar thaobh aibhéise de shaghas inar chuir mé tús le ceist mhór i leith oideachas na teicneolaíochta. Bhí roinnt plé ansin idir mé féin agus Aonghus i dtráchtaireachtaí leis an alt féin agus ar Twitter. I ndeireadh báire, scaoil Aonghus leis ar a bhlag féin inar mhínigh sé an scéal ar fad agus a thuras pearsanta isteach i saol an ríomhcláraitheora. Is spéisiúil an léargas é agus is fiú a léamh.

Sa bhlag mhír seo pléann sé na bunclocha atá de dhíth chun ríomhcláraitheoir a thógáil. Táim féin den tuairim gurb iad foighde agus stuacacht na tréithe is mó atá de dhíth ar ríomhchláraitheoir: foighde chun chur suas le cliaint dúra cosúil liomsa agus stuacacht chun leanúint leat i gcoinne constaicí loighice agus dothuisceana a bhíonn, go minic, féinchruthaithe.

Ach in ionad a bheith ag scaoileadh fúm is tharam anseo faoin droch-chaoi ina bhfuil oideachas na teicneolaíochta sa tír seo, tharraing scéal eile mo shúil le mhí anuas: is mise snag breac na teicneolaíochta amach is amach! Is mó constaic a pléadh sa nuacht teicneolaíochta le déanaí ó shocraigh roinnt comhlachtaí idirlín tabhairt faoi lá lándorcha in agóid ar SOPA. Rinne acht rialtas SAM “Stop Online Piracy Act” jab an-cheisteach de reachtaíocht cóipchirt don idirlíon. Fuair an reachtaíocht seo an-chuid tacaíochta ó na foilsitheoirí móra ceoil, scannáin agus téacs ach is beag comhlacht idirlín, ceoltóir, ealaíontóirnó foilsitheoir beag a bhí chomh tógtha leis. Is féidir an scéal ar fad a léamh is a thuiscint trí SOPA a chuardach ar líne. An fhadhb is mó a bhí ag lucht a fhreasúra ina gcoinne ná an tslí gur shocraigh lucht a dhréachta ar chasúr a úsáid in áit an chleite. A luaithe is a bhí ábhar faoi chóipceart scaipthe ar ghréasán bhí sé i gceist an gréasán sin a ghearradh ón idirlíon trí iarraidh ar ISP a chuntas a dhúnadh agus trí stop a chur le suíomhanna eile, beag nó mór, nascadh leo.

In Éirinn

Ag taifead ag ceolchoirmShocraigh brúghrúpa Éireannach StopSOPAIreland úsáid a bhaint as an spéis idirnáisiúinta seo i gcúrsaí dlí, teicneolaíochta agus cearta chunfeachtas tráthúil a sheoladh le haird a tharraingt ar reachtaíocht atá idir láimhe san Oireachtas faoi láthair. De réir mo thuisceana, tá deacracht ag an dream seo leis an mbealach ina bhfuil an reachtaíocht seo á achtú chomh maith le hábhar an achta féin. Is é bun agus barr an scéil ná nach ionann múnla gnó na gcomhlachtaí ceoil, scannáin, bogearraí is leabhair (EMI srl.) atá “ag cosaint a gcóipceart” agus comhshaoil réadúil an chultúir chéanna seo. Níl an t-airgead céanna le déanamh as an gcultúr seo a scaipeadh a thuilleadh agus tá an dinosaur ag fulaingt, ag casacht is ag rith ón scamall dubh atá ag alpadh a dhomhain. N’fheadar céard a bheas fágtha: cúpla puirtleog raithní, crogall agus armadillo? Ach fásfaidh bláthanna agus feilecáin, rud nár mhair faoi ré na ndionosár.

Abigail Smith and Sue Rynhart play origial music by Irish composersAn toradh is mó dar liom as an aird seo atá ar SOPA agus reachtaíocht digiteach, idirlín agus cóipcirt ná gur tharraing seo ceist na cruthaitheachta sa ré dhigiteach go lár an aonaigh arís. Ní haon saineolaí dlí mé ach tá deirfiúr agus triúr deartháir agam gur ealaíontóirí is ceoltóirí iad (Is mise caora bán na clainne – iad siúd na cuilthíní). Tá i measc mo chol ceathracha dearthóir faisin, ceoltóir eile, iriseoir, grianghrafadóir (atá pósta le grianghrafadóir): sin an-chuid daoine atá ag brath ar chultúr agus ar a gcearta mar chruthaitheoirí an chultúir sin le snáith a choinneáil faoin bhfiacail. Maith dom mar sin má bhraitheann tú go bhfuilim rud beag claonta ar cheist an chóipchirt sa ré dhigiteach.

Níl aon cheist gur gá le hathbhreathnú ar dhlithe cóipchirt atá de dhíth mar nach n-oireann dlí analógach don ré dhigiteach; dlí a scríobhadh in am an leabhair, na téipe agus an cheirnín. Sa ré úr seo, is féidir cóip dhigiteach fhoirfe a dhéanamh go síoraí. Nuair is féidir é sin a dhéanamh, druideann costas tairgeadh an bhunruda i ngar do neamhní. Conas gur féidir luach a chur leis an mbunrud mar sin? Ach fós tá costais ag baint le cruthú cultúir: go bunúsach, caithfidh ealaíontóir ithe agus ar thaobh eile an scéil, is gá foireann a íoc i dtionscail idirnáisiúnta an cheoil is na scannánaíochta.

Na Duartain in Aisce

Pret a mediatiserIs minic anois go mbíonn sé indéanta cóip a fháil go ‘mídhleathach’ nuair nach féidir aon ní a fháil go dleathach: féach mar shampla an clib TV ar do chuid iTunes: níl faic ann ach is féidir duartan a fháil den tsraith is nuaí ar teilifís áit ar bith ar domhan: ná caill do shobalchlár Filipíneach is ansa leat arís go brách! Nó an raibh tú féin chomh díomach is bhí mé féin faoi raon clár a bhí ar fáil ó Netflix nuair a seoladh iad le rí-rá mór anseo le déanaí? Is cinnte go luíonn bochtanas an rogha seo ag doras na gcomhlachtaí móra foilseacháin agus rialtas na tíre seo mar nach féidir leo réiteach a shocrú le leitheidí iTunes, Netflix, Spotify srl. a ligfeadh dóibh a gcatalóg a roinnt anseo. Céard é an dara rogha mar sin? Fan go dtí go bhfuil an t-ábhar ar fáil ar DD nó ar DVD?

Ach ní ceist teicneolaíochta seo ar fad dar liom. Is gá dúinn, in ionad léimt isteach ar an scéal, smaoineamh ar céard tá uainn. Tá fonn orainn éisteacht le ceol, leabhair a léamh, breathnú ar scannáin agus bogearraí áisiúla a úsáid. Tá a leithéid ann agus tá siad ar fáil go dleathach. Tá roinnt den ábhar seo agus luíonn a gcóipceart leis an duine a chruthaigh é ach tá cuid eile de agus is le comhlacht a luíonn an cóipceart. Is iadsan atá ag seasamh an fhóid i leith a gcóipceart ar son na gcruthaitheoirí agus ar ndóigh, ar maithe le leas a bhaint as an gceart céanna sin.

Tionscal Faoi Stró

Dublin City Jazz OrchestraMar sin is ceist oideachais agus moráltachta atá ann dar liom Má mhúintear go bhfuil luach ag baint le gach píosa ábhair a chruthaítear. Ach an ionann an luach a chuirtear síos do scannán nua Martin Scorsese agus céimí scannáin nó saothar Crash Ensemble agus buaiteoir X Factor? Gach seans nach gcuirfeadh formhór mór na ndaoine luach le haon cheann díobh. Sna argóintí seo freisin, bíonn an iomarca béime ar cheol: píosaí trí noiméad a d’fhéadfadh, ar lá maith, scríobh i maidin amháin, in aon uair amháin. Ach tábradaíl ar siúl ar scannáin, leabhair, bogearraí agus ar chláracha teilifíse, cnapáin chultúir a ghlacann na céadta uair an chloig ar na céadta daoine lena gcruthú. Teipfidh ar an tionscadal seo munar féidir múnla agus bealach nua a chruthú chun idirbheart an chultúir a chur i gcrích.

Conas gur féidir a leitheid a mhúineadh agus cé leis an “curaclam”? Thuig Tim O Reilly an cheist nuair a dúirt “Obscurity is the problem, not piracy”. Má tá saothar á chóipeáil, á íosluchtú, go dleathach nó mídleathach tá agat; is é an fhadhb is mó nuair nach bhfuil tóir ar an saothar; nuair nach bhfuil sé sa bhfaisean. Agus i gcomhthéacs cultúr an X-Factor, nach leor luach teachtaireacht téacs ar do chuid saothar? Nach “leo” siúd a vótáil ar a son buaiteoir an chomórtais?

Ní hé seo an chéad uair a scríobh mé faoi luach chultúir agus ealaíne agus táim cinnte go dtiocfaidh mé ar ais chuige.

Even God took a rest seven days later apparently*

Brace yourselves I’m about to rant. Probably not the best time considering my earlier accident and the humdinger of a headache I now have.

And who is causing my hackles to rise? Who has attracted my ire this time? Rachida Dati, that’s who. I’m not the only woman in the western world who is spitting tacks in her general direction this week. Rachida Dati, the 43 year old French justice minister, had her first child by caesarean section last week and went back to work 5 days later. This is upsetting me why exactly?

  • There are so many reasons that it is confusing me and I don’t like being confused.
  • Quoting The Guardian article where I read about it thanks to Rosemary “[b]usiness leader Sophie de Menthon said: “By absolutely wanting to play superwoman, Rachida Dati does a disservice to women’s cause … What is more, I, as the head of a business, would go straight to prison if I took back a colleague who returned from maternity leave after five days.” Whatever about her first comment, I’m dying to know which courageous French official in Halde or whichever authority in France looks after their labour legislation is going to tackle Sarkozy. See how he likes being made an example of. I wonder would he be so blasé with his own policies if it was his darlin’ Carla who’d just had an 8 lb baby cut out of her belly.
  • Why the heck do I know all of this information about Rachida Dati? I mean this in two ways:
    • How dignified is it that an individual who has just gone through a life changing event and serious surgery is being discussed hither and yon? Dati, I don’t need to know about your Caesarean – have a bit of decorum apart from anything else.
    • Also so what if she doesn’t want to listen to common medical advice and good sense. Media people (myself included): don’t give her the headlines.

  • I read also in the same article by Angelique Chrisafis the opinion that Dati may have felt pressure to return to work as the French government were bringing in “the biggest reforms in 200 years to the French legal system” and Dati couldn’t miss her moment in the sun. Hello! If that was the case why did she not have the section 3 weeks ago (or if she did have it at the earliest possible 37 weeks 3 weeks later)? And hello! Boss of the Year Sarkozy, could the legislation not have waited a week or two? What’s so bloody important and who the heck cares in week 1 back to work after les célébrations of la nouvelle annee? All anyone wanted to do last week was stay in bed and Dati was really rubbing our noses in it. She was legally obliged to take the week off and she swans into work nonetheless. Aaarrggghhh!!!
  • Further to this, I’m really sorry to break this to you, Rachida dear, but I don’t give a hoot about your precious legislation but I will always remember you as the “young mother” (boss of the year’s words not mine) who went back to work unnecessarily early after having her first child.
  • Having had two children I know that I too could probably have gone back to work 5 days afterwards. It was day 10 – 15 that would have been the real trial. I wonder how Dati is feeling now? Pas trés super, I’d say.
  • However, I know I’m being flip above and anyone who knows me or reads this blog regularly knows that I think that parenthood and especially early motherhood deserve special care from society. I am not the first commentator to say that Dati’s actions make a mockery of every single day of maternity leave for which each preceding generation campaigned. Not only that I think it makes a mockery of women’s right to work at all because I think realistically potential or actual motherhood has to be part of the package. How on earth are women supposed to continue as valid members of the workforce if their biology keeps getting in the way? We have an ageing population here in Ireland as do many developed countries and we need women to reproduce. I mean how the heck can Boss of the Year on the one hand have policies aimed at encouraging larger families (PDF) (which our large family regularly made the most of while travelling in France) and then allow one of his senior staff make an ass of the law?
    In fact I would go so far as to say that Dati’s actions makes a mockery of workers rights and legislation altogether.
  • How will my campaign for paternity leave fare if employers think that women don’t need time off? I firmly believe that maternity leave will only give women “equality” if paternity leave is also mandatory. A month after the birth of a child and two more months at their own discretion. As an interim step, parents should be allowed to choose which parent takes the existing leave especially families that don’t practice breastfeeding. And that’s a whole other upcoming post in the offing.

Okay I think that about covers the rant. Well today’s rant anyway. I’ve a few more up my sleeve that I’ve been mulling over the holidays but Rachida deserved special attention.

*I say apparently because obviously God doesn’t exist and so this theory of her resting is totally unprovable.