Yesterday evening I was going to write a post on a similar subject as gapingvoid: 10 things I hate about web 2.0. I agree with most of what he is saying to a greater or lesser degree. Hugh McLeod is always good for an ironical, fresh view on all things web.
I do believe that blogging has made the traditional media more wary of thinking about themselves as the ONLY source of information. I also have concerns that Web 2.0 is in the process of eating itself, starting with its nose to spite its face. A meaningful conversation in the real world doesn’t usually happen when someone is unneccesarilly rude (I can never, ever spell any form of the second last word there. Note to self: memorise the spelling of necessary? neccesary… It’s not called One of these days… for nothing, this blog!) but some bloggers and more so commenters think this is the best way to do it.
I have two rules when engaging someone on a blog:
My mammy was right: if you can’t say anything nice don’t say anything at all. However I will add an addendum to her sage words: if you can’t say anything nicely, don’t say anything at all. Feedback is important. How else will we improve? We all learn from our mistakes, but sometimes they have to be pointed out to us. That said nothing will make someone bridle more than “That is sh*t”. Surely it doesn’t take a genius or an extra five minutes to comment “I think what you are doing could be improved if you did X or Y. Maybe I could help you with it?”
If you are writing it, say it out loud first. Would you really say that to somebody standing in front of you? Would you say it over the phone? If you were a contestant on Big Brother would your comment result in your being up for eviction? (Oho timely reference wha’?) Does it sound blunt? Does it sound harsh? Does the issue you have merit such vehemence? If in doubt about whether your witty brand of sarcasm translates into text, go on, use an emoticon to take the edge off.
It costs nothing to be nice but it could earn you a lot.
I’m thinking of starting a slow-blogging movement. I can’t keep up. Damien Mulley gave me a mention on Friday and I haven’t had a chance to query his terminology. At least I can be intuigthe i ndá teanga, wha’? And how does he not know who I am when I offered my linguistic brilliance for judging best use of Irish in a blog in the Blog Awards? Mmmmm right back atcha.
He has an interesting post in the last few days as well about repeat winners of awards. I think limiting repeat wins is good approach. Má oibríonn sé d’Oireachtas na Gaeilge… In fact if you win Corn Uí Riada three times ever you aren’t allowed enter ever again. No fear there for me either.
N’fheadar céard é an Ghaeilge ar name-dropping? clú clamparáil… Dearídeoir… clú caiteoir no I think it has to be clú leagaire or ainm leagaire.
Himself is really settling into his new role as stay-at-home-dad. He hasn’t added the nippers into the mix yet. He’s going to finally get really good at the Crosaire and the nippers will finish up in the creche. He’s out at the moment hence my current online status, halfwatching telly.
(Dammit just lost this post when my browser crashed. Trying to piece it together) Josh Catone writes on ReadWriteWeb in the aftermath of Wednesday’s earthquake in Britain that
“citizen journalism tools being used by people who were on the ground in those areas [are] scooping the mainstream press.”
In his piece about this he refers to BreakingNewsOn a site that uses Twitter to report breaking news. I decided to have a look at BreakingNewsOn. Six of the top ten stories at the time I looked at it referred to traditional news agencies (CNN, ABC, New York Times etc.) as sources with no links. I think both have their place and Twitter and other micro-blogs are increasingly going to be the site of breaking news. However I think the majority of media consumers will for some time continue to visit sites such as RTÉ and BBC as their main news sources. Similarly I think we will see an increased use of Web 2.0 on traditional media sites. Having worked on a corporate-style news site I agree with the commenter who says “For the MSM to print unmediated chatter is expecting too much, surely?” although I imagine traditional news agencies will have to allow their reporters to do this more and more. The question “Who edits the news?” will generate even more interesting answers.
With the arrival of mobile video streaming from the likes of Qik (do those people know that we can see them all too?) we are also going to see more live video of planned and unexpected events. I think all these “citizen journalism tools” are brilliant especially if you can’t attend an event yourself.
Like the way I won’t be attending the BlogAwards tomorrow. The babysitter was sorted, Himself was roped in (if only in a let’s all go the circus frame of mind) but luckily I hadn’t reached the outfit planning stage when I was struck down with a nasty throat infection. Temperature of 40+ last night. Aches and pains all over. So it’s as well I wasn’t nominated. Really.
Tá an tImeall ag cuartú Podchraoltóir Faoi Oiliúint. Má tá spéis agat in obair chruthaitheach, digiteach mholfainn do hata a chaitheamh leis an jab seo. Is ceannródaí é Conn Ó Muineacháin sna meáin nua cuma má’s Gaeilge nó Béarla atá i gceist. Go bhfaighe an t-iarrthóir is fearr an post spéisiúil seo.